Skip to main content

Oedipus the King: Arguing with Creon

 How does Creon try to convince Oedipus that he is to be trusted? 

By Margaret

Creon begins his speech with a strong opening statement: ‘That’s not the case, if you applied reason as I do’. This highlights Creon’s strong use of logos in this address; he uses sound logic and reasoning to show Oedipus that that he is being irrational. Creon’s clear and direct way of outlining his points shows Oedipus that he means well and has Oedipus and Thebes’ best interests at heart.

            Furthermore, Creon uses several rhetorical questions throughout his speech: ‘Do you think that anyone/would choose to rule… if he had the same level of power?’ The use of these questions helps to engage Oedipus in what Creon is saying, forcing him to reflect on the rationality of his argument. Again, Creon’s use of logos is compelling Oedipus to perceive Creon as a legitimate opponent whose words are worth consideration.

            Moreover, Creon also uses some form of pathos to convince Oedipus of his trustworthiness: ‘Why would ruling be more pleasurable/than misery-free power and supremacy?’ Creon’s use of emotive language here, as well as in a few other places in his address, acts as a persuasive technique that balances his more dominant use of logos. This applies to Oedipus’ passionate disposition, while still retaining that sense of rationality which is key in contrasting with said disposition.

            In addition, several important rhetoric devices help pull Creon’s speech together: ‘As it is now, everyone greets me, everyone keeps me close,/everyone who wants something from you approaches me first’. In this case, Creon uses both anaphora and asyndeton to draw attention to his point. His repetition of the word ‘everyone’ is a helpful emphatic device which shows Oedipus the strength of his reasoning, thus helping to justify why Oedipus should trust him.

            Likewise, Creon uses these various rhetoric and persuasive tools to gradually build up Oedipus’ trust. This allows him to give Oedipus direct and specific advice regarding the validation of Creon’s argument: ‘If you want proof of this, then go to Pytho/and find out whether I reported the oracle to you accurately’. Creon’s confidence in giving this advice exhibits the honesty in his argument. Oedipus cannot ignore the power Creon holds by making this assertion, thus convincing him that Creon can be trusted.

            Similarly, Creon uses a variety of rhetoric devices to strengthen his assertion that he is innocent: ‘It’s an injustice to decide haphazardly/that bad men are good or good men are bad’. This use of diatyposis and antithesis engages the listener (Oedipus) using wordplay. Likewise, the epanalepsis with the word ‘bad’ helps to reinforce the wisdom in Creon’s words. This wisdom will register with Oedipus, helping him to see Creon in a more trustworthy light.

            Furthermore, Creon repeats his use of pathos by using catachresis  towards the end of his speech: ‘throwing away a good friend is like/thrusting your own beloved life from your body’. This metaphor uses dramatic hyperbole to intensify Creon’s meaning- that Oedipus will be doing this very act if he continues to accuse Creon in this way. The truth in this is very clear and, by this point, Oedipus cannot fail to understand what Creon has been trying to convey to him throughout this entire address.

            Lastly, Creon uses a powerful antithetical statement to conclude his speech: ‘only time reveals a man to be just,/but you could spot a bad one in just a single day’. The language used here is almost a warning in disguise for Oedipus, as if Creon is asking him ‘are you just or are you bad?’ Again, Creon’s clear and direct reasoning makes his argument plausible and understandable. This helps to convince Oedipus that Creon can be trusted, as it is obvious that Creon knows what he is talking about.




 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disappointment: The Unanswered Question in Larkin and Duffy

  Discuss the presentation of disappointment in the poems of Larkin and Duffy. By Margaret Both Larkin and Duffy use the theme of disappointment in some of their poems. In this essay, I will be looking at the way these two poets present this theme in four of their poems: ‘The Captain of the 1964  Top of the Form  Team’ and ‘Room’ by Carol Ann Duffy, and ‘Home is so Sad’ and ‘Mr. Bleaney’ by Philip Larkin.       The first pair of poems I will be looking at  is  Duffy’s ‘The Captain of the 1964  Top of the Form  Team’ and Larkin’s ‘Home is so Sad’. As well as centring on the theme of disappointment, these two poems focus specifically on how our remembrance of our past can disappoint us. Often, we remember things to  be better and more exciting than they actually were, causing the type of bitter nostalgia that plays a key role in both poems.       Duffy’s poem begins on a high: ‘I ...

'Closed Like Confessionals': Larkin on Mortality in 'Ambulances'

  Explore how Larkin presents mortality in ‘Ambulances’ By Margaret   Larkin’s poem ‘Ambulances’ presents themes of mortality and the meaning of life through death. The grim tone of the poem is set in the first line when Larkin describes ambulances as ‘Closed like confessionals’. This religious element seems very bleak in this context, giving an impression of intimacy and truth, both things which are present at the moment of a person’s death. This immediate yet subtle introduction of the theme of mortality chills the atmosphere of the poem, which uses the image of an ambulance to embody the reality of mortality.          Inevitable and unpredictable reminders of our mortality are also emphasised in this poem, using the ambulance metaphor. In the first stanza, Larkin states that ‘All streets in time are visited’ by the ambulance, and that they could stop at ‘any kerb’, presenting mortality as an ominous, lingering presence which is p...

To Atone or Not To Atone? McEwan's Two-Sided Tale

Atonement Book review by Margaret Ian McEwan Rating: 8/10 Date read: 8 June to 11 June Atonement is a 2001 British metafiction novel which takes place in three settings: 1935 England, Second World War England and France, and 1999 England. It follows the story of Briony Tallis, a thirteen-year-old, upper-class girl whose innocent mistake one summer night ruins the lives of her elder sister, Cecelia, and Cecelia’s childhood friend and lover, Robbie Turner. Briony spends the rest of her life trying to atone for her mistake, as the effects of it spread throughout her family. Atonement is centred around themes such as the power of storytelling, the nature of perspective, regret and guilt, and childhood versus adulthood (Sparknotes).  In short, I was enthralled by the first half and utterly bored by the second. I thought the writing was excellent; the setting was richly vivid, the characters deep and unique, and the story (at least the first part) absolutely gripping. Yet I hate war...