Skip to main content

Oedipus the King: Arguing with Creon

 How does Creon try to convince Oedipus that he is to be trusted? 

By Margaret

Creon begins his speech with a strong opening statement: ‘That’s not the case, if you applied reason as I do’. This highlights Creon’s strong use of logos in this address; he uses sound logic and reasoning to show Oedipus that that he is being irrational. Creon’s clear and direct way of outlining his points shows Oedipus that he means well and has Oedipus and Thebes’ best interests at heart.

            Furthermore, Creon uses several rhetorical questions throughout his speech: ‘Do you think that anyone/would choose to rule… if he had the same level of power?’ The use of these questions helps to engage Oedipus in what Creon is saying, forcing him to reflect on the rationality of his argument. Again, Creon’s use of logos is compelling Oedipus to perceive Creon as a legitimate opponent whose words are worth consideration.

            Moreover, Creon also uses some form of pathos to convince Oedipus of his trustworthiness: ‘Why would ruling be more pleasurable/than misery-free power and supremacy?’ Creon’s use of emotive language here, as well as in a few other places in his address, acts as a persuasive technique that balances his more dominant use of logos. This applies to Oedipus’ passionate disposition, while still retaining that sense of rationality which is key in contrasting with said disposition.

            In addition, several important rhetoric devices help pull Creon’s speech together: ‘As it is now, everyone greets me, everyone keeps me close,/everyone who wants something from you approaches me first’. In this case, Creon uses both anaphora and asyndeton to draw attention to his point. His repetition of the word ‘everyone’ is a helpful emphatic device which shows Oedipus the strength of his reasoning, thus helping to justify why Oedipus should trust him.

            Likewise, Creon uses these various rhetoric and persuasive tools to gradually build up Oedipus’ trust. This allows him to give Oedipus direct and specific advice regarding the validation of Creon’s argument: ‘If you want proof of this, then go to Pytho/and find out whether I reported the oracle to you accurately’. Creon’s confidence in giving this advice exhibits the honesty in his argument. Oedipus cannot ignore the power Creon holds by making this assertion, thus convincing him that Creon can be trusted.

            Similarly, Creon uses a variety of rhetoric devices to strengthen his assertion that he is innocent: ‘It’s an injustice to decide haphazardly/that bad men are good or good men are bad’. This use of diatyposis and antithesis engages the listener (Oedipus) using wordplay. Likewise, the epanalepsis with the word ‘bad’ helps to reinforce the wisdom in Creon’s words. This wisdom will register with Oedipus, helping him to see Creon in a more trustworthy light.

            Furthermore, Creon repeats his use of pathos by using catachresis  towards the end of his speech: ‘throwing away a good friend is like/thrusting your own beloved life from your body’. This metaphor uses dramatic hyperbole to intensify Creon’s meaning- that Oedipus will be doing this very act if he continues to accuse Creon in this way. The truth in this is very clear and, by this point, Oedipus cannot fail to understand what Creon has been trying to convey to him throughout this entire address.

            Lastly, Creon uses a powerful antithetical statement to conclude his speech: ‘only time reveals a man to be just,/but you could spot a bad one in just a single day’. The language used here is almost a warning in disguise for Oedipus, as if Creon is asking him ‘are you just or are you bad?’ Again, Creon’s clear and direct reasoning makes his argument plausible and understandable. This helps to convince Oedipus that Creon can be trusted, as it is obvious that Creon knows what he is talking about.




 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disappointment: The Unanswered Question in Larkin and Duffy

  Discuss the presentation of disappointment in the poems of Larkin and Duffy. By Margaret Both Larkin and Duffy use the theme of disappointment in some of their poems. In this essay, I will be looking at the way these two poets present this theme in four of their poems: ‘The Captain of the 1964  Top of the Form  Team’ and ‘Room’ by Carol Ann Duffy, and ‘Home is so Sad’ and ‘Mr. Bleaney’ by Philip Larkin.       The first pair of poems I will be looking at  is  Duffy’s ‘The Captain of the 1964  Top of the Form  Team’ and Larkin’s ‘Home is so Sad’. As well as centring on the theme of disappointment, these two poems focus specifically on how our remembrance of our past can disappoint us. Often, we remember things to  be better and more exciting than they actually were, causing the type of bitter nostalgia that plays a key role in both poems.       Duffy’s poem begins on a high: ‘I ...

The Winding Path to Gilead

Gilead Book review by Margaret Marilynne Robinson Rating: 6.5/10 Date read: 12 June to 18 June Gilead is a 2004 fictional epistolary novel by Marilynne Robinson, whose main character, a Congregationalist pastor called John Ames, is writing letters to his son. John is in his late seventies and married to a woman more than thirty years his junior, with an unnamed son of about six years old. John knows that, due to his heart condition, he will not live for much longer, so he has decided to leave a monologic record of various experiences, thoughts, meditations, observations and impressions for his son to read when he is older, presumably after John’s death. However, John’s son plays a relatively minor role in the book itself; rather, Jack Boughton, the son of John’s best friend, plays the most active role in the story, serving as one of the primary focuses of John’s thoughts.  I found this novel to be highly engaging on an ideological level, though the story itself was meandering a...

The Glorious Gatsby: A Classic That Deserves Its Title

The Great Gatsby Book review by Margaret F. Scott Fitzgerald Rating: 8.5/10 Date read: 19 June The Great Gatsby was written by F. Scott Fitzgerald in 1925 and explores themes of love, class, past versus future, the American dream and dysfunctional relationships within the setting of the Jazz Age in New York. The novel is narrated by Nick Carraway, a bond salesman living in the fictional neighbourhood of West Egg on Long Island. His next-door neighbour is the infamous and enigmatic Gatsby: owner of riches, thrower of parties and inviter of speculation. Gatsby, Nick, Nick’s cousin Daisy Buchanan, her husband Tom, their friend Jordan Baker, the woman with whom Tom Buchanan is having an affair, Myrtle Wilson and her husband George all form the cast of characters in this rich, sultry and absorbing narrative. This novel was much shorter than I expected, and I read all of it in a day. It was an enthralling story; not fast-paced or action-packed, but vivid and bold, overflowing with vibran...