Palm Trees, Prospero and Pizza: My Take on Holmes' The Tempest

The Tempest: A Review

By Margaret

Palm trees, Prospero and pizza; Wednesday, 12 October, was a day to remember. 6am saw the Drama and Literature classes of Years 11, 12 and 13 loading onto a coach for a 7-hour, music-filled ride to Shakespeare’s Globe, London. After a bite to eat and a browse at the Globe gift shop, we took our places in the Yard, channelling the spirits of the Elizabethan groundlings of old.

Shakespeare’s The Tempest is a wild ride in its tamest form. However, we were unprepared for the delightfully chaotic, zany, roguish rollercoaster of a comedy we experienced. Sean Holmes’ modern, beach-resort take on this classic play was the perfect combination of slapstick humour, drunken frivolity and fiery romance. This was well-balanced with thematic undertones of freedom, colonialism, power and justice, which added a rich tone to the performance.

The stage was brimming with captivating actors– Prospero gave an especially winning performance while sporting a bright yellow pair of budgie smugglers. The enslaved fairy, Ariel, quickly won the audience over in a bedazzled cowboy suit, and the sweet but witty Miranda was enchanting. Trinculo and Stephano were a riot, giving us a rousing rendition of ‘Three Lions’ and a side-splitting romp around the stage in Harry Potter costumes. The assortment of pinstriped aristocratic castaways was both amusing and riveting. The deposed monster, Caliban, stole the show by leading us all in a stirring call-and-response number. The most poignant moment of the performance was undoubtedly the closing scene. We stared, spellbound, up at Prospero as he gave his final speech. Silence reigned as he climbed down from the stage and made his solemn exit through the crowd. We wordlessly formed a pathway for the Duke, transfixed by the sorrow that gripped the whole theatre. I will never forget the thrill in the breath I released as we cheered during the finals bows, smiles and laughter all around.

We spent a happy evening at a nearby Pizza Express, touched with thespian inspiration by the legacy of the Bard. We discussed the play’s quirks and quibbles next to a pleasant twilight view of St. Paul’s across the Thames. A sleepy bus ride back to school concluded our trip, but though we had returned, I doubt that any of us was quite the same person we had been that morning. As Prospero said, ‘We are such stuff as dreams are made on, and our little life is rounded with a sleep’.

The Tempest review: a super-fun take on Shakespeare's magical final play

Comments

The Love and Lies of Mr Rochester

How far do you agree with the statement ‘Jane is subjected to unacceptable levels of manipulation and deceit at the hands of Mr. Rochester’? By Margaret It is certainly true that Mr. Rochester subjects Jane to extreme and nearly intolerable levels of manipulation throughout Charlotte Brontë’s 1847 novel Jane Eyre . Indeed, it is one of the central themes of the book, and almost none of the major events of the story would have taken place if Rochester had not deceived Jane regarding a certain skeleton-in-the-closet, or in this case, wife-in-the-attic. However, the question remains: are Rochester’s attempts to manipulate and deceive Jane in any way acceptable? The first and most notable of instance of Rochester’s deceit and manipulation towards Jane is when he brings Blanche Ingram to Thornfield. From the first mention of Miss Ingram, she is described as “‘beautiful’, ‘accomplished’” and “‘graceful’”. Mr. Roche...

The Odyssey: Is Penelope Perfect?

To what extent do you agree that Penelope is portrayed as completely without fault in The Odyssey ? By Margaret The character of Penelope in The Odyssey is portrayed as a woman of the highest and purest moral order. Penelope is frequently commended by other characters for her ‘loyalty’ to Odysseus and described throughout the narrative as ‘prudent’ and ‘flawless.’ Thus, it is clear that Homer presents Penelope as completely without fault in The Odyssey and that his original audience would have received her as such. However, the questions persist as to whether Penelope possesses any implicit faults which remain unmentioned simply for narrative purposes, and whether Penelope’s apparent flawlessness is also timeless. Penelope’s character in her first appearance in The Odyssey could easily be considered without fault. Homer describes her as ‘gracious’, entering the room with her ‘waiting-women’ and standing with her ‘shining veil ac...

'What Will Survive of Us is Love': Larkin's 'An Arundel Tomb'

Explore how Larkin depicts love in this poem. By Margaret Larkin begins the poem, ‘An Arundel Tomb’, by describing a 14 th century tomb in Chichester Cathedral, for which the poem is named: ‘Side by side their faces blurred, /The earl and countess lie in stone’. Immediately, the fact that the stone reproductions of this dead husband and wife are lying ‘Side by side’ conveys an image of tragic romance, of undying love. Yet Larkin is neutral, simply describing the monument, without commenting on its meaning. In the second stanza, Larkin focuses on the most interesting aspect of the ‘Arundel Tomb’: ‘One sees, with a sharp tender shock, /His hand withdrawn, holding her hand.’ This sweet detail seems almost misplaced in the cynical, nihilistic world of Larkin’s poetry. His use of the phrase ‘sharp tender shock’ perfectly relates the surprise with which a visitor to the Cathedral would notice such a detail. L...

A Wife Now Living

Search This Blog