On Pain of Death: Mad Machiavelli

The Prince

Book Review by Margaret

Niccolo Machiavelli

Rating: 6/10

Date read: 24 May to 8 June

The Prince was written in 1513 by Niccoló Machiavelli, an Italian diplomat and political theorist. It is intended to be an instructional guide for those in power, namely, princes. It is perhaps well known for its controversial theory that sometimes a prince would have to commit immoral, even cruel acts, in order to have a successful rule.

I read this book out of pure curiosity, and while some of the subject matter was new and interesting to me, I can’t say much of it seemed very likely. I’m no political theorist, but I do have a fair bit of common sense, and much of what Machiavelli claimed here seemed to be a bit far-fetched. Indeed, I would actually go so far as to call some of the principles suggested by Machiavelli as morally outrageous. ‘Since love and fear can hardly exist together, if we must choose between them, it is far safer to be feared than to be loved’. What would this mean for a society? Yes, Machiavelli intends these principles to be used by rulers, not ordinary people, but how can you expect your ruler to follow principles which do not apply to you? Thus, if everyone went around trying to be feared because ‘love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage', but ‘fear preserves you by a dread of punishment that never fails’, society would collapse! Everyone would hate each other and there would be bitterness and despair everywhere. And this is only one of the appalling ideas Machiavelli discusses in this book.

It must also be admitted that there is also a thread of truth in some of what Machiavelli says. ‘The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look at the men he has around him’ certainly seems true, but I still don’t think I could believe Machiavelli was very intelligent, no matter what men were around him. Machiavelli's view of violence, deception, punishment, scheming and war as casual tools of gaining power seems, at the very least, like a red flag. My rating of this book may seem surprisingly high, given my opinion of it, but although I did not think the book was very helpful or very true, I still enjoyed it. It was fairly engaging and provided a lot of food for thought. I would recommend it, purely on the grounds of fresh subject matter to consider.

The Incredible Life of Machiavelli, Author of 'The Prince'

Comments

The Love and Lies of Mr Rochester

How far do you agree with the statement ‘Jane is subjected to unacceptable levels of manipulation and deceit at the hands of Mr. Rochester’? By Margaret It is certainly true that Mr. Rochester subjects Jane to extreme and nearly intolerable levels of manipulation throughout Charlotte Brontë’s 1847 novel Jane Eyre . Indeed, it is one of the central themes of the book, and almost none of the major events of the story would have taken place if Rochester had not deceived Jane regarding a certain skeleton-in-the-closet, or in this case, wife-in-the-attic. However, the question remains: are Rochester’s attempts to manipulate and deceive Jane in any way acceptable? The first and most notable of instance of Rochester’s deceit and manipulation towards Jane is when he brings Blanche Ingram to Thornfield. From the first mention of Miss Ingram, she is described as “‘beautiful’, ‘accomplished’” and “‘graceful’”. Mr. Roche...

The Odyssey: Is Penelope Perfect?

To what extent do you agree that Penelope is portrayed as completely without fault in The Odyssey ? By Margaret The character of Penelope in The Odyssey is portrayed as a woman of the highest and purest moral order. Penelope is frequently commended by other characters for her ‘loyalty’ to Odysseus and described throughout the narrative as ‘prudent’ and ‘flawless.’ Thus, it is clear that Homer presents Penelope as completely without fault in The Odyssey and that his original audience would have received her as such. However, the questions persist as to whether Penelope possesses any implicit faults which remain unmentioned simply for narrative purposes, and whether Penelope’s apparent flawlessness is also timeless. Penelope’s character in her first appearance in The Odyssey could easily be considered without fault. Homer describes her as ‘gracious’, entering the room with her ‘waiting-women’ and standing with her ‘shining veil ac...

Blood or Bodies: Which Part of The Odyssey is Most Horrific?

Which part of Odysseus’ journey do you feel is the most horrifying? By Margaret Odysseus’ journey from Troy to his home in Ithaca is full of dramatic, dangerous and exhilarating events. Many of these events involve gruesome and appalling acts of violence and result in the deaths of some of Odysseus’ companions, leaving the survivors in great distress. There are three main events in ‘The Odyssey’ which could be considered the most horrific: Odysseus’ encounter with Laestrygonians (from which Passage B is taken) , Odysseus’ encounter with the monster Scylla, or Odysseus’ encounter with ‘the tribes of the dead’ . In Passage B, an exploration party sent from Odysseus’ crew is ‘confronted by Antiphates’ wife’, a giant , terrifying woman who immediately summons her husband, ‘the famous Antiphates’ , upon meeting the men. Antiphates ‘promptly [makes] his murderous intentions clear ’ and snatches and eats one of them men. The other men flee back to the ship ...

A Wife Now Living

Search This Blog